---
title: "GitHub Copilot | Integrations | Minds"
canonical_url: "https://getminds.ai/guide/integration-copilot"
last_updated: "2026-09-08T19:56:28.866Z"
meta:
  description: "Use Minds from GitHub Copilot. Add an MCP server (streamable HTTP) with the server URL below. Authorize via OAuth if offered — otherwise create an API key..."
  "og:description": "Use Minds from GitHub Copilot. Add an MCP server (streamable HTTP) with the server URL below. Authorize via OAuth if offered — otherwise create an API key..."
  "og:title": "GitHub Copilot | Integrations | Minds"
  "twitter:description": "Use Minds from GitHub Copilot. Add an MCP server (streamable HTTP) with the server URL below. Authorize via OAuth if offered — otherwise create an API key..."
  "twitter:title": "GitHub Copilot | Integrations | Minds"
---

Minds

September 8, 2026·Minds Team # **GitHub Copilot | Integrations** Use Minds from GitHub Copilot. Add an MCP server (streamable HTTP) with the server URL below. Authorize via OAuth if offered — otherwise create an API key and use it as “Authorization: Bearer minds_…”. ## Setup GitHub Copilot's agent mode in VS Code speaks MCP — your Minds research tools become available right in your editor chat. 1. Open GitHub Copilot's MCP or connector settings (often under Tools, Integrations, or Extensions). 2. Add an MCP server (streamable HTTP) with the server URL below. 3. Authorize via OAuth if offered — otherwise create an API key and use it as “Authorization: Bearer minds_…”. ## MCP Server URL`https://getminds.ai/mcp`[View full MCP documentation](https://getminds.ai/mcp/overview) ## Review a proposed feature with an audience A useful Copilot task begins with the customer-facing change described in a pull request, rather than the repository as a whole. Extract the proposed benefit, the important limitation, and the explanation a customer would actually see. Ask the assistant to prepare an Audience Study that checks which expectations that explanation creates. Include a question about what respondents think happens after they click the main action. Bring the findings back into the review as specific wording or acceptance-criteria questions. Keep technical defects, simulated customer concerns, and decisions made by the reviewer distinguishable. A favorable response is not a reason to skip security review, and an objection may call for clearer communication rather than additional implementation. [~~All integrations~~](https://getminds.ai/guide/integrations) [Minds](https://getminds.ai/)© 2026 Minds. Your target audience. AI-driven and grounded in transparent evidence. Build within minutes. [Minds on X (Twitter)](https://x.com/mindsai_co) [Minds on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/mindsaicompany/) [Minds on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/getminds.ai/)Minds is part of [![ESOMAR Corporate 2026](https://getminds.ai/images/newsroom/logos/esomar-corporate-2026-v2.png)ESOMAR](https://esomar.org/) [![bayern design](https://getminds.ai/images/customer-logos/bayern-design.svg)bayern design](https://bayern-design.de/) [![CSSDA Best UX Design Award](https://getminds.ai/images/newsroom/logos/cssda-best-ux-award.png)CSSDA Best UX Design Award](https://www.cssdesignawards.com/) [![CSSDA Best Innovation Award](https://getminds.ai/images/newsroom/logos/cssda-best-innovation-award.png)CSSDA Best Innovation Award](https://www.cssdesignawards.com/) [![CSSDA Best UI Design Award](https://getminds.ai/images/newsroom/logos/cssda-best-ui-award.png)CSSDA Best UI Design Award](https://www.cssdesignawards.com/)